On August 28, 2024, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued a final rule (the Final Rule) aimed at combatting illicit financial activities and national security threats in the investment adviser sector. This new rule extends certain anti-money laundering (AML) and countering financing of terrorism (CFT) compliance obligations to registered investment advisers (RIAs) and exempt reporting advisers (ERAs), such as requiring RIAs and ERAs to adopt AML/CFL compliance procedures and report suspicious activity to FinCEN.
FinCEN believes the requirements will “address the current uneven application of AML/CFT requirements across the investment adviser sector”1, and bring the United States into greater compliance with international AML/CFT standards.
Investment advisers affected by the Final Rule have until January 1, 2026 to ensure their compliance.
The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) requires “financial institutions” to establish and maintain AML/CFT compliance programs meeting certain minimum standards. The definition of “financial institution” covers several categories of financial businesses, including broker-dealers, banks, credit unions and mutual funds. While large financial institutions were already subject to stringent AML/CFT regulations imposed by the BSA, many smaller entities, including RIAs and ERAs, have now been brought within its scope.
The Final Rule adds “investment adviser” to the definition of “financial institution”, thereby broadening the class of regulated institutions. FinCEN defines “investment advisers” as including both investment advisers registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and investment advisers that report to the SEC as ERAs.
The category of “investment adviser” substantially covers all RIAs. However, FinCEN clarified that for those investment advisers with a principal place of business outside the U.S., the Final Rule applies only to their advisory activities that (a) take place within the U.S, including through the involvement of the investment adviser’s U.S. personnel or (b) involve advisory services to a U.S. person or a foreign-located private fund with an investor that is a U.S. person. The Final Rule does not apply to state-registered advisers, foreign private advisers or family offices (as defined in SEC regulations).
The Final Rule will require RIAs and ERAs to:
FinCEN has delegated its examination authority for the requirements of the Final Rule to the SEC, the federal functional regulator responsible for the oversight and regulation of investment advisers.
The Final Rule acknowledges that some types of customers or investors pose greater risks than others for money laundering, terrorist financing or other illicit finance activities, and that the level of risk for private funds may vary due to factors such as the individual fund’s investment strategy, targeted investors, and jurisdiction. Thus, FinCEN expects an investment adviser that is the primary adviser to a private fund or other unregistered pooled investment vehicle to make a risk-based assessment of the illicit finance activity risks presented by the investors in such investment vehicles. To make these assessments, FinCEN recommends considering the minimum subscription amount, restrictions on investor types, restrictions on redemptions or withdrawals, and any currency transactions conducted with investors.
The risk-based approach of the Final Rule aims to provide investment advisers the flexibility to design their programs to meet the specific risks presented by their customers. The Final Rule does not require investment advisers to collect beneficial ownership information for legal entity investors.
The Final Rule has wide-ranging implications for RIAs and ERAs. By requiring affected investment advisers to implement AML/CFT programs, FinCEN aims to close the gaps in the financial regulatory framework that have historically allowed for illicit financial activities. While many investment advisers have already voluntarily adopted Know-Your-Customer (KYC) procedures and AML/CFT programs to comply with industry best practices, FinCEN’s formalization of such processes will require advisers to review the sufficiency of their procedures in light of the mandated minimum standards.
RIAs and ERAs should begin preparing now for the January 1, 2026 deadline, as compliance with the Final Rule will be a lengthy process and require meaningful consideration on a case-by-case basis. For investment advisers that already have robust AML/CFT programs, minimal to moderate effort may be required to ensure their procedures can be conformed to the Final Rule, but others will have to develop entirely new programs. The AML/CFT procedures currently employed by other financial institutions may not suffice for investment advisers to meet their new obligations. Consequently, it will be important for investment advisers to consult with their legal counsel and compliance consultants to ensure that their AML/CFT programs will withstand regulatory scrutiny.
While an investment adviser will be allowed to delegate all or parts of its AML/CFT operations to certain third-party service providers2, such as fund administrators or broker-dealers, the investment adviser will still be fully responsible and liable for their program's compliance with FinCEN's Final Rule. Thus, it is imperative that affected investment advisers act now to prepare their AML/CFT programs and train their senior officers and employees on the new compliance requirements.
To discuss these issues, please contact the author(s).
This publication is a general discussion of certain legal and related developments and should not be relied upon as legal advice. If you require legal advice, we would be pleased to discuss the issues in this publication with you, in the context of your particular circumstances.
For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Janelle Weed.
© 2024 by Torys LLP.
All rights reserved.