Authors
On April 15, 2026, the federal government launched the Artificial Intelligence Sovereign Compute Infrastructure Program (SCIP), an initiative under the Canadian Sovereign AI Compute Strategy intended to support the development of large-scale, sovereign public AI compute infrastructure accessible to Canadian researchers and innovators1. In addition, the government’s Spring Economic Update (PDF) outlined the six pillars that will underpin Canada’s forthcoming National AI Strategy. Interested industry proponents should consider the SCIP and its requirements under the program guide when assessing how to leverage this public compute infrastructure funding, and should also take into account the newly announced pillars to align their proposals with Canada’s sovereign AI compute objectives.
Released on April 28, the Spring Economic Update previewed the six pillars that will underpin the forthcoming National AI Strategy. While the SCIP appears to directly advance the fourth pillar, applicants should consider how their proposals engage with all six pillars and monitor announcements regarding the forthcoming strategy. The six pillars are as follows:
The delivery of the SCIP is structured around two layers: an Infrastructure Build Layer, responsible for constructing state-of-the-art AI supercomputing infrastructure, and a National Service Layer, which will handle user support and integration with Canada's existing digital research infrastructure. Together, these layers form a coordinated national ecosystem requiring strong collaboration. The successful proponent of the Infrastructure Build Layer will be required to work closely with the National Service Layer provider to integrate the new compute infrastructure.
The program guide includes a table which identifies the roles, responsibilities, and areas requiring collaboration between the two layers to deliver a cohesive end-to-end user experience. This current call for applications is only for the Infrastructure Build Layer.
The SCIP is guided by five core priorities to bolster Canada’s large-scale, sovereign AI compute capability. Critically, when evaluating the application, Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISED) will assess how the application is aligned with these core priorities, which together account for 40 percent of the assessment.
Proponents seeking SCIP funding must demonstrate how their proposals align with the priorities, which include:
Eligible applicants for SCIP funding are limited to:
All proposals must also satisfy sovereignty requirements, meaning that core compute and storage infrastructure must be owned or contractually controlled by Canadian entities, with governance and decision-making authority resting with Canadian institutions. Data residency in Canada is prioritized, and supply contracts should maximize Canadian integration while limiting lock-in risks with foreign vendors. Sovereignty is assessed both at the initial screening stage to confirm eligibility and also as part of the two-part assessment. The sovereignty requirements at the assessment stage includes similar factors, such as ensuring Canadian data residency and retaining decision-making authority with Canadian institutions.
While certain aspects of the sovereignty requirements are stringent, the requirements still allow for a measured degree of non-Canadian involvement. In particular, the infrastructure control requirements emphasize the need for safeguards to “limit instances in which a foreign party can unilaterally restrict use or access” to the compute infrastructure (as opposed to imposing a total prohibition on foreign participation). Additionally, the SCIP requires applicants to only “prioritize” data residency in Canada. Together, these elements suggest a degree of flexibility in the SCIP’s guidance on how principles of data sovereignty may be satisfied, particularly for AI compute initiatives where use cases may vary in sensitivity.
Eligible activities under this call include but are not limited to building and enhancing compute infrastructure, developing sovereign data storage solutions, and supporting research data management. Eligible costs are those approved by the Minister as necessary to advance SCIP's objectives and eligible activities, and may include expenditures related to infrastructure construction, leasing, maintenance, and operations, as well as salaries, equipment, professional services, and talent development training.
Applicants must submit detailed information including organizational details, key staff qualifications, technical requirements (such as providing service and hardware deliverability within 18 months of entering into a contribution agreement), sovereignty requirements, economic benefits, Indigenous partnerships, estimated costs, funding sources, and a fiscal year breakdown of all project funding, among other requirements. For the full details on the SCIP’s 11 application sections, applicants should consult the program guide.
Prospective applicants must request the application form from ISED at aiscip-picsia@ised-isde.gc.ca and submit their application by 1:00 p.m. ET on June 1, 2026 to the same email. The lead applicant will serve as the main point of contact with ISED and may only lead one application while participating in others as a consortium or partnership member.
Applications will undergo a multi-stage assessment process beginning with an initial screening to confirm applications are complete and eligible. ISED will confirm whether the applicant is an eligible organization, has provided proof of its not-for-profit or institutional legislative status, and meets the SCIP’s sovereignty requirements. Interested proponents should consider these sovereignty requirements and whether they are able to meet the Canadian ownership and decision-making obligations as part of this initial screening.
Following the initial screening, ISED will conduct a two-part evaluation consisting of (i) a Technical Execution Assessment, which assesses the applicant's capacity to deliver the proposed infrastructure, and (ii) a Priorities Assessment, which accounts for 40 percent of the overall score and evaluates the proposal’s alignment with SCIP's five core priorities described above.
To discuss these issues, please contact the author(s).
This publication is a general discussion of certain legal and related developments and should not be relied upon as legal advice. If you require legal advice, we would be pleased to discuss the issues in this publication with you, in the context of your particular circumstances.
For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Richard Coombs.
© 2026 by Torys LLP.
All rights reserved.