Authors
Sarah Rimer
In 2016, the blanket prohibition in the Criminal Code pertaining to voluntary euthanasia and assisted suicide was modified to allow such measures where a person is suffering from a “grievous and irremediable medical condition”. Under the original legislation, a person was deemed to be suffering from a grievous and irremediable medical condition if (a) such person had a serious and incurable illness, disease or disability; (b) such person was in an advanced state of irreversible decline in capability; (c) the illness, disease or disability or the state of decline caused enduring and intolerable physical or psychological suffering; and (d) such person’s natural death had become reasonably foreseeable.
The law was amended in 2021 with the passing of Bill C-7, which established a two-track approach to qualifying for MAiD; one track facilitates access in circumstances where a person’s natural death is reasonably foreseeable, and the other track eliminates the requirement that death be foreseeable but introduces additional procedural safeguards.
In this bulletin we will explain the current criteria for MAiD, the consent and capacity requirements under each of the two tracks and what can (and can’t) be done under current law to express a desire for MAiD in estate planning documents.
The procedures for accessing MAiD will depend on whether a person’s natural death is reasonably foreseeable. The purpose of this distinction is twofold: first, it facilitates access for those whose natural death is reasonably foreseeable, and second, it ensures that additional time and expertise are devoted to MAiD requests from those whose natural death is not foreseeable.
In general, to become eligible for MAiD a person must satisfy the following criteria:
In cases where a person’s death is reasonably foreseeable, such person must make a request for MAiD in writing, the person must be assessed by two medical professionals, the person must be informed that their request can be withdrawn at any time, and immediately before MAiD is provided, the practitioner must give the person an opportunity to withdraw the request and must ensure that the person gives express consent.
If the person is at risk of losing decision-making capacity before the scheduled date of administration, the “final consent” requirement may be waived by written agreement between such person and the practitioner—under these circumstances, MAiD will be administered even if the person lacks capacity to consent at the time (unless the person demonstrates refusal or resistance to the administration of MAiD by words, sounds or gestures).
If a person’s natural death is not reasonably foreseeable, in addition to the procedures set out above, there are additional requirements to receive MAiD: (a) the period from the person’s first assessment to the administration of MAiD must be at least 90 days (or less if the person is at risk of losing decision-making capacity); (b) one of the two assessors must have expertise in the condition causing the person’s suffering; (c) the person must be informed of, and connected to, resources available to relieve their suffering; and (d) the person and the practitioners must agree that the person has seriously considered all means available to alleviate such person’s suffering.
There is no waiver of the “final consent” requirement; the person wishing to receive MAiD must give full and informed express consent at the time of administration, meaning the person must have capacity to consent on the date MAiD is provided.
As described above, there is some flexibility to waive the requirement that consent to MAiD be provided immediately before MAiD is administered; however, this requires (a) that the person’s natural death be reasonably foreseeable and (b) that the waiver be agreed to in writing by the person and the practitioner. Accordingly, consent to MAiD in a Living Will or consent provided by an attorney under a Power of Attorney for Personal Care will be insufficient to meet the procedural requirements for the administration of MAiD. Notwithstanding these limitations, given the evolution of the law in this area, some individuals opt to include a request for MAiD in their Living Will in the hope that the law will become more flexible in the future.
To discuss these issues, please contact the author(s).
This publication is a general discussion of certain legal and related developments and should not be relied upon as legal advice. If you require legal advice, we would be pleased to discuss the issues in this publication with you, in the context of your particular circumstances.
For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Janelle Weed.
© 2024 by Torys LLP.
All rights reserved.