On April 20, 2023, the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) adopted—effective immediately—amendments to Section 606 – Prospectus Offerings of the TSX Company Manual to clearly define the factors that the TSX will consider in determining whether a prospectus offering is a bona fide public offering (the Amendments).
In addition, the TSX has issued TSX Staff Notice 2023-0002 (the Staff Notice) to provide updated guidance on pricing a public offering or private placement where there has been recent disclosure of material information.
Section 606 of the TSX Company Manual outlines the factors that the TSX will consider when assessing whether a distribution of securities by prospectus is a bona fide public offering, or whether the offering should, instead, be subject to review under, and compliance with, the TSX’s private placement rules under Section 607 – Private Placements (the Private Placement Rules) which, absent shareholder approval, impose certain limitations on an offering (e.g., discount, dilution and insider participation restrictions).
Prior to the Amendments, the TSX Company Manual did not provide details with respect to the relative weighting or importance of the enumerated factors when assessing whether a prospectus offering constitutes a bona fide public offering under TSX rules.
Following consultation with various market participants, on December 1, 2022 the TSX issued for public comment proposed amendments to Section 606 of the TSX Company Manual. Following the public comment period, on April 20, 2023 the TSX adopted the Amendments—effective immediately—substantially in the form of the proposed amendments.
The Amendments set out the following factors that the TSX will consider when determining whether or not a prospectus offering constitutes a bona fide public offering:
The TSX has previously provided guidance that the “Market Price” of a financing should reflect all material events, changes or announcements (Material Information).
Under the Staff Notice, in cases where an issuer seeks to price a financing following the recent dissemination of Material Information, the TSX will view the Market Price as follows: (i) in respect of a prospectus offering, the closing price of the most recently completed trading session; and (ii) in respect of a private placement, the one-day, volume-weighted average trading price, in both cases reflecting one clear trading session post-dissemination of the Material Information.
By way of example, in connection with a public offering, if Material Information is disseminated pre-market on Monday, the Monday closing price may be used. If Material Information is released on Monday at 11:00 a.m. (EST), the Tuesday closing price may be used.
The TSX may use discretion to determine an alternate formula in cases where the closing price or one-day, volume-weighted average trading price, respectively, does not appear appropriate, such as where the stock does not appear sufficiently liquid.
In cases where an issuer seeks to price a financing in the normal course, absent recent dissemination of Material Information, the TSX will typically expect the Market Price to be assessed based on: (i) in respect of a prospectus offering, the closing price of the most recently completed trading session; and (ii) in respect of a private placement, the five-day, volume-weighted average trading price.
These changes do not impact the TSX’s previous guidance regarding pricing an offering while an issuer possesses undisclosed Material Information (for example, when an issuer plans to undertake an offering to finance an undisclosed acquisition). In these circumstances, the TSX will continue to permit an offering to be priced prior to the release of Material Information if it is satisfied that the proposed transaction would not have been approved by the issuer’s board but for the concurrent agreement in respect of the offering.
The Amendments and the Staff Notice are welcome developments for the Canadian capital markets as they provide clarity, predictability and greater transparency into the TSX’s policies with respect to the pricing of offerings.
Issuers and dealers are cautioned, however, to carefully consider insider participation in public offerings where the offering price exceeds a 15% discount to the closing price. For example, issuers with a stock price greater than $2 that exceed a 15% discount on a prospectus offering should ensure that there is no insider participation. Under the Amendments, such insider participation would be reviewed under the Private Placement Rules, and a discount in excess of 15% in a private placement by such issuers generally requires shareholder approval for the offering to close.
To discuss these issues, please contact the author(s).
This publication is a general discussion of certain legal and related developments and should not be relied upon as legal advice. If you require legal advice, we would be pleased to discuss the issues in this publication with you, in the context of your particular circumstances.
For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Janelle Weed.
© 2024 by Torys LLP.
All rights reserved.