Last week, on the margins of the national Energy and Mines Ministers’ Conference in Calgary, the Government of Canada published a new Cabinet Directive on Regulatory and Permitting Efficiency for Clean Growth Projects (the Cabinet Directive). For many in Canada’s public and private sectors, this long overdue directive will replace the last federal cabinet directive designed to get major projects built faster, which was published more than 15 years ago1. While the Cabinet Directive does not carry the same legal weight as a law or regulation, a cabinet directive is generally seen as a federal policy instrument that is more substantial than a policy guideline issued by a single department because the directive is endorsed by all of cabinet.
The federal government initially stated its intention to develop the Cabinet Directive earlier this year when new measures were announced in Budget 2024 to improve federal regulatory and permitting processes. In June, the government published an action plan entitled Building Canada’s Clean Future (the Action Plan), elaborating on the new measures announced in Budget 2024, including new target timelines for impact assessment and permitting processes, a commitment to create a Federal Permitting Dashboard that reports on the status of clean growth projects, and the establishment of a Federal Permitting Coordinator and a Crown Consultation Coordinator. This Cabinet Directive also comes shortly after the highly-anticipated amendments to the Impact Assessment Act were introduced and ultimately became law on June 20, 2024.
While the Government of Canada has had a busy spring rolling out measures intended to improve federal regulatory and permitting processes, significant criticism continues to be directed at 1) its design of an impact assessment process that has resulted in few project approvals and a constitutional loss at the Supreme Court of Canada, and 2) a lack of coordination and urgency across all federal regulatory departments and agencies when it comes to permitting major projects. Although the federal cabinet appears to finally be responding with this direction to the public service, project proponents and investors remain wary of further administrative measures that do not impose enforceable deadlines.
For years, the Government of Canada has focused the bulk of its industrial policies and new regulatory actions on combating climate change and supporting sectors aligned with a net-zero emissions global economy. This is often described as “clean growth”, a term that is generally not well defined and has been evolving alongside the development of technologies and global economic trends. This new Cabinet Directive prioritizes the following “key sectors that are aligned with a net-zero future”:
As announced in Budget 2024, and now specified in the Cabinet Directive, federal entities are now expected to:
Additionally, the Impact Assessment Agency and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission are expected to work together to ensure a three-year review process for nuclear projects.
Between the new measures announced in Budget 2024, the Action Plan and the Cabinet Directive, there will be no shortage of internal governance mechanisms to facilitate a focus on clean growth projects. Specifically, the Cabinet Directive outlines and assigns responsibilities for the following internal governance structures:
With the new governance mechanisms, the Cabinet Directive clarifies that regulatory entities such as the Canadian Energy Regulator and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission will continue to operate at arm’s length to preserve their regulatory independence and to ensure that their autonomy is “not affected” by the directive.
Similar to the 2007 Cabinet Directive on Improving the Performance of the Regulatory System for Major Projects, this Cabinet Directive is intended to accelerate the Government of Canada’s decision-making and set out clear federal roles and responsibilities within the public service to that end. It is intended to “give confidence” to Canadians, and presumably also investors in projects in Canada, in the integrity and efficiency of federal regulatory and permitting systems.
This new Cabinet Directive, in fact, devotes an entire section to “culture change” within the 14 relevant federal departments and agencies aimed at creating a sense of urgency without compromising the objectives of the legislation and regulations they are implementing. It lists ten specific actions the public service can take, including working to “respond quickly” to proponent applications, providing “risk-informed” guidance, and increasing early engagement with Indigenous peoples.
One significant change to the status quo will be when the status of projects becomes available through a new public permitting dashboard. Currently, the Impact Assessment Agency of Canada updates its Registry with the status of projects in their system5; however, for projects seeking a federal permit, such as under the Fisheries Act, Canadian Navigable Waters Act, Species at Risk Act, or Explosives Act, there are no transparency mechanisms to determine the status of the federal permit. The Cabinet Directive provides that the Action Council will be responsible for identifying projects to include on the public dashboard and other internal tracking mechanisms designed to ensure the timeline targets are met.
The Cabinet Directive is published as approved by the federal cabinet, and therefore takes effect immediately. However, the Cabinet Directive only creates obligations for entities and individuals within the federal government and does not give rise to any obligations or modify any laws or regulations applicable to the private sector. Presumably in the coming months, the Action Council will begin meeting and working to establish the public permitting dashboard and internally enforce the target timelines set out above. Whether or not these measures will have the practical effect of speeding up or improving the effectiveness of project and permit approvals—and if so, to what extent—remains to be seen.
To discuss these issues, please contact the author(s).
This publication is a general discussion of certain legal and related developments and should not be relied upon as legal advice. If you require legal advice, we would be pleased to discuss the issues in this publication with you, in the context of your particular circumstances.
For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Janelle Weed.
© 2024 by Torys LLP.
All rights reserved.