As Quebec's class proceedings regime enters its fourth decade and Ontario's regime moves into its 21st year, the "if it is certified, it will settle" paradigm is gone. More class actions go to trial, and counsel’s attention has shifted from certification to the differences between conducting a class proceeding trial and conducting an ordinary trial. Are there differences? Yes. But, with minor exceptions, the plaintiffs must still prove their case at trial. The merits are and should be the focus of a common issues trial, not the policy considerations that inform the question whether or not a claim should proceed as a class action in the first place.
Below, we discuss key differences between class action trials and ordinary trials, as well as highlights from certain class actions that have gone to trial.
Read the full article here (PDF).
Reproduced with permission of the publisher from Class Action Defence Quarterly, vol. 7, no. 3, March 2013.
To discuss these issues, please contact the author(s).
This publication is a general discussion of certain legal and related developments and should not be relied upon as legal advice. If you require legal advice, we would be pleased to discuss the issues in this publication with you, in the context of your particular circumstances.
For permission to republish this or any other publication, contact Janelle Weed.
© 2017 by Torys LLP.
All rights reserved.